Psychoanalysis explains self-deception as a lie without a liar

Evidence

Thus psychoanalysis substitutes for the notion of bad faith, the idea of a lie without a liar; it allows me to understand how it is possible for me to be lied to without lying to myself since it places me in the same relation to myself that the Other is in respect to me; it replaces the duality of the deceiver and the deceived, the essential condition of the lie, by that of the “id” and the “ego.” It introduces into my subjectivity the deepest intersubjective structure of the Mit-sein. Can this explanation satisfy us? — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness, 283

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharp contrast between psychoanalytic ‘lie without a liar’ and bad faith proper — the core distinction of this chapter. This is the pivot on which Sartre rejects the Freudian explanation.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that psychoanalysis imports alienating intersubjectivity into one’s own subjectivity is dense and paradigm-shifting for how self-knowledge is conceived.
  • XREF: connects to: Lying requires full conscious possession of the truth being hidden; Claiming total self-honesty itself signals defensive self-deception — Bob Altemeyer, The Authoritarian Specter, 1813; Genuine self-deception and intentional social deception are distinct phenomena (+8 more)

Broader Connections