Postmodernism may be the same epoch as modernism, not a radical break.
Related
- Historical change forces theorists to invent new, more concrete concepts (similarity 0.86)
- Postmodernism can only be defined relative to the equally confused term modernism (similarity 0.85)
- Postmodernism is best treated as a historical condition, not an ideas set. (similarity 0.85)
- Locating Postmodernism within Modernism severs its link to stages of social development (similarity 0.85)
- Postmodernism discourse must be dated to its specific historical conjuncture (similarity 0.85)
- Postmodernism’s case rests on a radical break dated to 1960 (similarity 0.84)
- Postmodernism cannot be defined once and settled; it must be reworked each use (similarity 0.84)
- Modern philology emerged by secularizing language from divine to human origins (similarity 0.84)
- Ideologues claiming the key to reality must adapt to every new event (similarity 0.84)
- Debates over postmodernism are fundamentally political judgments about capitalism. (similarity 0.83)
- Transformative change is gradual within continuities, not clean breaks (similarity 0.83)
- So-called postmodern changes merely accentuate long-standing modern Western tendencies (similarity 0.83)
- Postmodernism is a cultural dominant allowing coexisting subordinate features, not a uniform style. (similarity 0.83)
- Postmodernism theory makes uncertainty about the age into its founding clue (similarity 0.83)
- Postmodernism emerged as a response to the revolutionary failure of 1968-76. (similarity 0.83)