Postcolonial theory recasts decolonization as a literary-critical rather than political contest

Evidence

In this sort of formulation the ‘contest over decolonization’ becomes mainly a literary and literary-critical affair, and the elite academic intelligentsia claims for itself, in an amazing gap between fact and self-image, the role of the world’s revolutionary vanguard. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 393

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the broader claim that academic theory substitutes discursive for material struggle; resonates with critiques of the linguistic turn in political history. — connects to: Decoloniality rejects postcolonialism for complicity in Western universalist thinking — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 267; African literature entered US syllabi as nationalist evidence, not critical object — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 261; Postcolonial literary theory’s rapid shift from nationalism to poststructuralism concealed material world dynamics — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 163 (+8 more)