Postcolonial status denotes structural state shifts, not mere birth after decolonization

Evidence

In political thought, these categories have a precise meaning because they refer not to the date of decolonization but to identifiable structural shifts in state and society, and in the hierarchy of systemic determinations which structure the relations between the imperialist bourgeoisie and the direct producers of the imperialized but sovereign nation-state of what was previously a colony. To describe, on the other hand, a critic as ‘post-colonial’ simply because he/she came of age after decolonization is a tautology; to ascribe a shared cultural attitude towards Western dominance to all intellectuals who begin writing after decolonization, and a structurally different attitude to all those whose intellectual formation was completed under colonial rule, regardless of their individual social and political locations, is the most arrant idealism and facilitates a very peculiar kind of ahistorical levelling. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 384

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘colonial’ vs ‘post-colonial’ as structural-political categories, not generation markers.
  • XREF: Connects to postcolonial theory debates (Said, Spivak, Bhabha) about the politics of the term.