Post-colonial states grew more differentiated and competitive, not more unified

Evidence

The key fact about the post-colonial history of this so-called Third World is that each nation-state came under the dominance of a distinct national bourgeoisie (existing or emergent) as it emerged from the colonial crucible and was then assigned a specific location in the international division of labour as it is organized by imperialism, so that the period has come to be characterized not by greater unity but by increasing differentiation and even competitiveness among these states. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 29

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Postcolonial Third World states grew more competitive and fragmented, not unified. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 81; Colonizing states manufactured internal homogeneity while colonial states managed difference — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1721