Political groups adopt nationalist rhetoric opportunistically

Evidence

The JVP initially sympathized with the Tamils’ plight and even argued that its cadres and Tamil rebels were fighting against the same oppressive regime, but the party changed its position and embraced nationalistic rhetoric when doing so suited its purposes. The JVP turned especially nationalistic after the July 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord was signed. The accord was exceedingly unpopular in the mostly Sinhalese south, and the banned JVP Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology 25 vilified the Indian presence and conducted a murderous campaign seeking to topple the government. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 159

Categorization

  • XREF: Mirrors the manufacturing-the-enemy theme in the reader’s broader research on solidarity sustained by constructed external threats; JVP flipped its stance when nationalism became electorally/popularly useful. — connects to: Sacralized territorial rhetoric travels across unrelated national conflicts; Nationalists borrow others’ sacralized land narratives as strategic templates — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized:…, 184; Language policy framed as zero-sum triggered counter-nationalism. (+14 more)

Broader Connections