Plants communicate knowledge through embodied action rather than verbal language

Evidence

What if you were a teacher but had no voice to speak your knowledge? What if you had no language at all and yet there was something you needed to say? Wouldn’t you dance it? Wouldn’t you act it out? Wouldn’t your every movement tell the story? In time you would become so eloquent that just to gaze upon you would reveal it all. And so it is with these silent green lives. A sculpture is just a piece of rock with topography hammered out and chiseled in, but that piece of rock can open your heart in a way that makes you different for having seen it. It brings its message without a single word. Not everyone will get it, though; the language of stone is difficult. Rock mumbles. But plants speak in a tongue that every breathing thing can understand. Plants teach in a universal language: food. — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 450

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly bridges the Soundscape course’s listening-to-more-than-human-voices thread with Eco-Justice’s reciprocity ethic — plants as communicators whose ‘language’ is food. — connects to: Individual plant preferences are transmitted across generations through family memory — Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac: With Other
, 262; Western science dismissed plant communication by measuring plants against animal capacities — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom,
, 76; Naming a plant falls far short of knowing the plant itself — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom,
, 155 (+7 more)
  • SEED: Angle: ‘plant languages vs. human languages’ as a way in to animacy-grammar and rights-of-nature arguments from ch13.
  • DEFINE: Frames plants’ teaching mode as an embodied universal tongue, contrasting with vocal language — key to the polyad’s listening-as-method.

Broader Connections