Pied noir denial and metropolitan distraction forestalled any French response to the revolt

Evidence

At a first emergency conference summoned by Léonard early on the morning of the 1st, he, Vaujour and General Cherrière, the Army Commander-in-Chief, all agreed that, from the evidence already available, it was a question of isolated incidents rather than of any general insurrection. Equally it was agreed (thus giving roots to the fateful legend) that all must have been decreed from Cairo, and not set up within Algeria itself. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 299 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Before Sétif, various attempts had been made at political and social reform — in 1868, 1919 and 1944. By and large they had followed a dismally stereotyped pattern; initiated by metropolitan French governments, frustrated by pied noir pressure-groups. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 101 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Modest as were the reforms it would have introduced, the abortion of the Blum-Viollette Bill undoubtedly marked a vital turning-point for the Algerian nationalist movement. At the same time it also bestowed on the pieds noirs a first dangerous awareness that they could call the tune on any reform initiated by a government in Paris. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 115 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: The strike risked escalating into general insurrection and forced total French response.; The pied noir lobby immediately demanded violent suppression of the revolt; Pied noir mass demonstrations nearly lynched the French prime minister (+6 more)

Broader Connections