Out-of-power domestic groups generate most conspiratorial talk
Evidence
But losses may be cumulative, and conspiracy talk is most likely to issue from domestic groups who fail to achieve power, objectives, or resources. β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 699
Categorization
- recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
- XREF: connects to: Marginalized groups retain conspiracy theories longer than groups with variable fortunes. β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 107; Out-of-power groups always drive conspiracy talk as winners disengage β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 590; Elite rhetoric substantially raises public conspiracy talk β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 679 (+10 more)
Broader Connections
- Political losing raises a groupβs propensity for conspiratorial reasoning rather than causing it
#expands(0.85) β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 756 - Political exclusion drives the mob toward conspiratorial readings of power
#expands(0.82) β Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 311 - Conspiracy beliefs stay stable while conspiracy talk shifts with power
#expands(0.80) β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 749 - Conspiratorial accusations against a party rise the longer it holds power
#exemplifies(0.78) β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 734 - Conspiracy theories are accessible ways to speak truth to power
#qualifies(0.75) β Joseph E. Uscinski and Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, 842