Orientalist scholarship produced knowledge about the Orient that Orientals themselves did not possess

Evidence

And indeed the vocabulary of specialized power and acquisition is particularly associated with Sacy’s reputation as a pioneer Orientalist. His heroism as a scholar was to have dealt successfully with insurmountable difficulties; he acquired the means to present a field to his students where there was none. He made the books, the precepts, the examples, said the Duc de Broglie of Sacy. The result was the production of material about the Orient, methods for studying it, and exempla that even Orientals did not have. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 341

Categorization

  • XREF: The claim that scholarship produces the Orient’s own exempla feeds directly into how Orientalism constructs the Orient as object — a base for the Islamophobia texts. — connects to: European knowledge of the Orient assembled a restricted archive of tropes that controlled novelty; Early Orientalists codified and domesticated the Orient into a European province of learning.; Orientalist scholarship constructs narrative order over the Orient’s supposed nonhistory. (+8 more)
  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: the move where the colonized subject is defined as lacking self-knowledge that only the colonial scholar can supply — compare to modern ‘who speaks for Islam’ debates.
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 341

Broader Connections