Orientalist scholars supplied the transhistorical ā€˜Islamic terrorism’ narrative at the 1984 conference

Evidence

Lewis argued at the conference that the term ā€œIslamic terrorismā€ was apt because ā€œIslam is a political religionā€ and Mohammad, in contrast to other religious leaders, had ā€œfounded a state and governed it.ā€ Lewis explained that it was ā€œinevitable that when the Islamic world confronts the problem of terrorism, that problem, too, assumes a religious, indeed in a sense an Islamic, aspect.ā€ Elie Kedourie began his speech by stating that there is ā€œa prevalent—and justifiable—impression that an appreciable part of terrorist activities today originate, and frequently take place, in the world of Islam, and particularly in its Arab portion.ā€ He then cherry-picked historical examples from various Muslim kingdoms, starting with the assassination of Ali, going on to the Assassins of the tenth century, and up to Khomeini’s Iran, which ā€œexemplifies the idea of a ā€˜terrorist state,ā€™ā€ to knit together a narrative of transhistoric ā€œIslamic terrorism.ā€ He ended by raising the alarm that ā€œterrorism in modern Islam is unlikely to prove a flash in the pan.ā€ These two conferences were instrumental in the development of the ideology of a racialized terrorist threat. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 444

Lewis argued at the conference that the term ā€œIslamic terrorismā€ was apt because ā€œIslam is a political religionā€ and Mohammad, in contrast to other religious leaders, had ā€œfounded a state and governed it.ā€ Lewis explained that it was ā€œinevitable that when the Islamic world confronts the problem of terrorism, that problem, too, assumes a religious, indeed in a sense an Islamic, aspect.ā€ Elie Kedourie began his speech by stating that there is ā€œa prevalent—and justifiable—impression that an appreciable part of terrorist activities today originate, and frequently take place, in the world of Islam, and particularly in its Arab portion.ā€ He then cherry-picked historical examples from various Muslim kingdoms, starting with the assassination of Ali, going on to the Assassins of the tenth century, and up to Khomeini’s Iran, which ā€œexemplifies the idea of a ā€˜terrorist state,ā€™ā€ to knit together a narrative of transhistoric ā€œIslamic terrorism.ā€ He ended by raising the alarm that ā€œterrorism in modern Islam is unlikely to prove a flash in the pan.ā€ These two conferences were instrumental in the development of the ideology of a racialized terrorist threat. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 456

Categorization

  • XREF: Core evidence for the MOC thread: Lewis’s ā€˜Islam is a political religion’ claim is the exact ideological bridge converting geopolitical enemies into an essentialized religious-racial category. — connects to: The 1984 conference fused Israeli, neocon, and Orientalist voices into a terrorism ideology — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 443; Orientalists fabricated a transhistoric Islamic terrorism narrative from cherry-picked cases — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 456; The War on Terror recycled pre-existing Orientalist academic discourse into state violence — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 267 (+3 more)
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 444; Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 456

Broader Connections