Orientalist discourse simultaneously homogenizes and divides its subjects

Evidence

As Lisa Lowe (1991) reminds us in her work on British and French Orientalism, this was a process of homogenization that was both constantly dividing and enumerated through scientific and rationalist discourses. Orientalism simultaneously homogenizes and divides; it represents a discursive formation that organizes race, class, and gender into a historical project. — Junaid Rana, Terrifying Muslims, 286

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Articulates the core paradox of Orientalism as discursive formation: it flattens diversity while insisting on fine-grained enumeration and division.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The homogenize-and-divide simultaneity is a genuinely dense, reusable analytic — it explains how classification systems function as power technologies, not just in Orientalism but across racial/colonial knowledge production generally.
  • XREF: connects to: Orientalism’s totalizing discourse critique erases all sites of resistance and liberation; Orientalism and Third World Literature are complementary homogenizing gestures served by ethnic intellectuals — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, 824