Organizational incentives silence dissent inside firms riding unsustainable leverage

Evidence

You may well ask: were there no smart people in Wall Street to sound the alarm bells? Of course there were. But their warnings were drowned out. Month after month the Jills and the Jacks raked in gargantuan profits. Traders who spoke out against them were shunned as moaning losers. Managers who hardly understood the complexity of the derivatives that overfilled their coffers with money felt compelled to silence dissent. The dissenters had a choice: quit, which some did, or join in this leverage racket – a techno-euphemism for huge debt fuelling ridiculous bets. As long as the going was good, it was as if they had discovered an ATM in their living room which kept churning out unlimited cash without charging it to any bank account. — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism, 900

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the reader’s earlier work on how institutional structures suppress internal whistleblowing — parallels the law-merchant chapters’ account of how groups enforce conformity. — connects to: Assetization of IP reduces incentives to develop actual products — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy:…, 67; Firm-level accumulation rates depend on macro forces irreducible to individual firms — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 817; Organizational reward structures tie agents’ interests to the organization, not clients (+8 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 900

Broader Connections