Option prices equal the cost of a portfolio that replicates the option’s payoff

Evidence

In contrast, Black, Scholes, and Merton’s arguments were at their core simple and elegant. If the price of a stock followed the standard model of a lognormal random walk in continuous time, and other simplifying assumptions held (see below), it was possible to hedge any option transaction perfectly. In other words, it was possible to construct a continuously adjusted portfolio of the underlying stock and government bonds or cash that would “replicate” the option: that would have the same return as it under all possible states of the world. Black, Scholes, and Merton then reasoned that the price of the option must equal the cost of the replicating portfolio: if their prices diverged, arbitrageurs would buy the cheaper and short sell the dearer, and this would drive their prices together. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 95

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Explains the core replication-and-no-arbitrage logic behind the Black-Scholes equation.
  • XREF: connects to: Option price must equal the cost of a continuously adjusted replicating portfolio. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 95; Option prices equal the expected payoff discounted at the riskless rate — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1284; Pricing under a risk-neutrality fiction yields the same option price as arbitrage pricing. — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1283 (+2 more)

Broader Connections