Objective group rule proves beneficial only when subordinates need impartiality, not mercy
Evidence
Within the given relationship and its particular contents, the situation of the subordinate may be influenced, favorably or unfavorably, by the objective or by the individually subjective character of this relationship; and, accordingly, differences result from this. Where the subordinate, in line with his situation, needs the tenderness, altruism, and favor of the superordinate, he will fare badly under the objective domination by a plurality. Inversely, under conditions where only legality, impartiality, and objectivity are favorable to his situation, the rule which has these features will be more desirable for him. It is characteristic of this phenomenon that the state, although it can legally condemn the criminal, cannot pardon him; and even in republics, the right to pardon is usually reserved for exercise by particular individuals. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 342
Categorization
- SEED: The structural inability of the state/pardon paradox — a collective can condemn but cannot pardon — is a sharp angle for an essay on institutional leniency vs. personal mercy.
- XREF: connects to: Subordinate class institutions can be absorbed to contain rather than end opposition.; State assistance is efficient only where objective criteria dominate — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 430; Dominant powers codified their own practical invulnerability as the overriding war norm (+2 more)
Related
- Collective bodies cannot perform mercy, which only individuals can grant (similarity 0.80)
Broader Connections
- State assistance is efficient only where objective criteria dominate
#corroborates(0.85) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 430 - Impartiality’s false symmetry neutralizes opposition and suppresses class content
#qualifies(0.75) - Subordinate class institutions can be absorbed to contain rather than end opposition.
#exemplifies(0.50) - Dominant powers codified their own practical invulnerability as the overriding war norm
#exemplifies(0.45)