OAS terror backfired by accelerating rather than wrecking the peace negotiations.

Evidence

So it was imperative to reach a settlement before a complete breakdown of civil order occurred in Algeria. Just such an aim had indeed become a priority of the O.A.S.: to provoke a Muslim backlash by their ferocious outrages, which would in turn force French army riposte, thereby wrecking negotiations with the F.L.N. But it was a strategy that totally defeated its own ends; far from preventing negotiations, the O.A.S. terror was precipitating them and making both sides more disposed to concluding a final settlement. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1548 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

But, not for the first time, the O.A.S. was proved to be defeating its own ends; principally because of the atmosphere of terror created by the O.A.S., and despite its threats of “sanctions”, since the beginning of April no less than one hundred thousand pieds noirs had already left the country — or one in ten of the total European population. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1614 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Provocation terrorism backfires by accelerating the settlement it aims to prevent — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1548; The O.A.S. terror campaign backfired and sped French withdrawal from Algeria.; The O.A.S. sabotaged peace talks by assassinating moderates and Muslims. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1481 (+5 more)

Broader Connections