OAE measures could become a fast clinical speech-in-noise diagnostic
Evidence
The awareness of this issue is essential for avoiding such consequences, however the diagnosis can be problematic, especially in the less severe cases. Certainly, methodologies for studying this articulated hierarchical system have the potential to drive the understanding of new insights into its mechanisms and to serve as an instrument of diagnosis for neural disorders related to speech. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 4428 (
#exemplifies, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Clinical audiology’s testing tools originated from psychoacoustic research; Speech processing deficits are hard to diagnose in mild cases — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 4428; Psychoacoustic measures probe efferent function even where OAEs fail
Related
- Cochlear emission measurements could aid clinical speech-in-noise diagnosis (similarity 0.87)
- Clinical audiology’s testing tools originated from psychoacoustic research (similarity 0.86)
- Loudness drives decision weights, so OAEs may predict listening-in-noise ability (similarity 0.83)
- Speech processing deficits are hard to diagnose in mild cases (similarity 0.80)
- Psychophysical and EEG measures predict speech-in-noise ability better than pure-tone audiometry (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- Psychoacoustic measures probe efferent function even where OAEs fail
#corroborates(0.78) - Speech processing deficits are hard to diagnose in mild cases
#exemplifies(0.72) — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 4428 - Clinical audiology’s testing tools originated from psychoacoustic research
#qualifies(0.70)