Non-domination requires active citizen contribution and cannot be produced by institutions alone.
Evidence
The coproduction model assumes that “consumer production is an essential complement to the efforts of regular producers,” and in the absence of this contribution, “nothing of value will result” (Parks et al. 1981, 1001-2). The coproduction of non-domination could be considered what Aligica calls “a scenario in which the inputs are interdependent and non-substitutable” (2019, 77). Aligica argues that selfgovernance could be considered as a process of coproduction (79). A similar case can be made for non-domination: in the absence of citizens fulfilling their editorial role, policies that track their common avowable interests would not be guaranteed. It is solely through this contestatory role that the prospects for freedom from domination would be enhanced. — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic, 74
Categorization
- DEFINE: Extends the coproduction concept from public goods to the political value of non-domination, characterizing citizens’ contestatory role as an interdependent, non-substitutable input.
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic: Social…, 74
- XREF: connects to: Freedom requires civic trust, not solitary defensive walls — Philip Pettit, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and…, 1192; Social capital enables citizens to contest policies endangering non-domination. — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic: Social…, 34; Alternatives failing to address structures of domination cannot achieve abolition — Davis, Angela Y, Are Prisons Obsolete, 286 (+3 more)
Related
- Social capital enables citizens to contest policies endangering non-domination. (similarity 0.85)
- Freedom requires a well-ordered institutional framework to reduce domination. (similarity 0.81)
- Polycentric governance structures enable citizens to resist domination through multiple remedies. (similarity 0.80)
- Non-domination is less skeptical of government but socially more radical than non-interference (similarity 0.79)
- Overcoming capitalism alone would not prevent new forms of domination (similarity 0.78)
- Anti-domination institutions must remove power, not just reduce harm probability (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- Social capital enables citizens to contest policies endangering non-domination.
#corroborates(0.85) — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic, 34 - Freedom requires civic trust, not solitary defensive walls
#corroborates(0.82) — Philip Pettit, Republicanism, 1192 - Non-domination requires normative reasons for respect, not just legal sanctions
#corroborates(0.82) — Philip Pettit, Republicanism, 1289 - Overcoming capitalism alone would not prevent new forms of domination
#corroborates(0.78) — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 1568 - Fairness in cooperation requires outside options, not contribution.
#contradicts(0.78) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 44 - Alternatives failing to address structures of domination cannot achieve abolition
#corroborates(0.75) — Davis, Angela Y, Are Prisons Obsolete, 286