Noise annoyance cannot be captured by physical sound parameters alone.

Evidence

Annoyance that is considered the overall evaluation of the disturbance and the unpleasantness of environmental noise remain highly subjective, linked to social and cultural backgrounds. Finally, annoyance and all the effects of noise on human life (but also on animal life) cannot be simply described by a few physical parameters. In this direction is addressed the psychoacoustics approach and methodologies that considers other aspects beyond the physical sonic components, such as context, kind of information, individual expectation, and attitude to the sound. — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology, 1441

Categorization

  • XREF: Reinforces the ch21/ch22 theme that annoyance tracks context and interpretation more than decibel level. — connects to: Noise-level reduction alone often fails to improve sonic environments perceived as unpleasant. — Almo Farina, Soundscape Ecology: Principles,…, 71; Sound quality cannot be assessed except through psychophysical experiments with human subjects — Ville Pulkki, Matti Karjalainen, Communication Acoustics- An…, 2331; Psychoacoustic annoyance models only work within limited signal sets. (+6 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections