Nkrumah argued formal decolonization left colonial economic control intact

Evidence

Noting that ‘decolonisation’ was a word much used by imperialist spokesmen to describe the transfer of political sovereignty, he argued that colonialism still controlled that sovereignty, and former colonies still provided the raw materials for their former rulers’ manufactures. ‘The change in the economic relationship between the new sovereign states and the erstwhile masters is only one of form’, Nkrumah manitained. ‘Colonialism has achieved a new guise.’ — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 289

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precise framing of neocolonialism: political sovereignty transferred while economic dependency persists — a definitional anchor for the reader’s austerity/human-rights analysis.
  • XREF: This ‘neocolonialism’ frame anticipates contemporary critiques of structural adjustment and austerity imposed on the Global South — central to the reader’s topic. — connects to: Formal decolonization gave way to a neo-imperial global economic order — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 315; Colonialist justifications recur largely unchanged in post-war development discourse — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1590; The postcolonial condition begins with colonial contact and persists beyond formal decolonization (+1 more)

Broader Connections