Neuroscience without a theory of transformation exposes itself to ideological co-option

Evidence

We have shown that, by proposing no theory or interpretation of this transformation or this transition—which cannot simply be the result of observation or of objective description— neuroscientiïŹc discourse in general exposes itself to ideological risk and offers nothing new to mankind, while plasticity, far from producing a mirror image of the world, is the form of another possible world. To produce a consciousness of the brain thus demands that we defend a biological alter-globalism. — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 260

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • SEED: Angles for an essay: when a scientific concept lacks its own theory of transition (plasticity→flexibility), the corporate/management world fills that gap — a memo-drafting cautionary tale.