Neoliberalism’s contestedness reflects its diffuse, multi-variant nature, not emptiness.

Evidence

No. The difficulty in labeling individuals “neoliberal” is precisely an effect of neoliberalism being a diffuse and contested political ideology/project not tied to a single organization. That there are varieties of neoliberalism does not mean that the concept is entirely without merit. It is a political label and an academic label rather than an entity. This does not mean its use implies propaganda rather than simply a pejorative. — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 2095

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Whether ‘neoliberalism’ names a real project or is purely an academic/political label remains contested — worth chasing the reception of this defense.
  • DEFINE: Offers a working account of what using the term ‘neoliberalism’ does and does not commit one to.
  • XREF: connects to: Ideological diversity is normal and not grounds for discarding the term neoliberalism — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 16; Neoliberalism’s contested definition does not make the term analytically useless — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 15; Neoliberalism is internally diverse and marked by real internal conflict — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 45 (+12 more)

Broader Connections