Municipal boundary lines perpetuate racial and class segregation

Evidence

What is less obvious is that these local boundary lines, very often, are purely artificial; they perpetuate racial and class segregation. The federal government, to its discredit, once discouraged integration in public housing, in mortgage policy, and in other ways. These policies were eventually outlawed, but lines drawn around certain areas contin­ ued to preserve residential segregation. The social and economic disadvantages between these racially identified spaces become compounded because local entities tax their own people, and spend for their benefit. And those invisible boundary lines—​along with zoning policies and land use policies that keep out the poor—​serve to preserve the “cul­ ture” and “ambience” of the place, and exclude “undesirables” from the town. — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law, 1349

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to environmental justice and land/place threads across the polyad. — connects to: Municipal borders are legal creations, not natural features — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law: An Introduction, 1347; Hidden legal structures quietly lock in existing social and economic conditions — Lawrence M. Friedman and Grant M. Hayden, American Law: An Introduction, 1340; Fair Housing Act can reach municipal zoning decisions harming communities of color (+16 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Directly relevant to the trees-as-infrastructure article’s point that land-use structures shape who benefits from place.

Broader Connections