Monks built anachronistic historical claims to legitimize politicized Buddhism

Evidence

Scholar monk Walpola Rahula best articulated the bases of political Buddhism in a 1946 book entitled Bhiksuvage Urumaya (later translated as The Heritage of the Bhikkhu), which argued that given their mandate to perform social service, monks could participate in politics and had done so since the time of Buddha. Although historically monks did advise kings, legitimize rulers, and thereby influence policy, H. L. Seneviratne (1999) has vigorously challenged Rahula’s claim. However, many Rahulite bhikkhus have resorted to radical politics and have espoused positions antithetical to Buddhist teachings. Significantly, political Buddhism emphasizes politics over Buddhist values (Schalk 2007) because it disregards Sri Lanka’s polyethnic heritage and seeks to institutionalize a Buddhist ethos for the entire country. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 51

Categorization

  • SEED: The ‘constructed antiquity’ move — building a timeless lineage to legitimize a recent political program — parallels exactly how nationalist mythologies manufacture continuity. Could anchor an essay on how putative ‘primordial’ identities are doctored from contingent history.
  • XREF: Connects to Hobsbawm’s ‘invention of tradition’ and the reader’s wider question about manufactured rather than primordial enmity. — connects to: Modern challenges to the sangha, not primordial identity, explain monks’ political engagement. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist
, 94; The very forces that built Ceylonese secularism also cultivated Buddhist communalism.; Sri Lanka’s constitution enshrines Buddhism in a privileged state role. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist
, 144 (+11 more)

Broader Connections