Modernity’s reflexivity rests on cultural commitment and power, not pure reason

Evidence

Modernity is universalising not only in terms of its global impact, but in terms of the reflexive knowledge fundamental to its dynamic character. Is modernity distinctively Western in this respect? This question has to be answered affirmatively, although with certain definite qualifications. The radical turn from tradition intrinsic to modernity’s reflexivity makes a break, not only with preceding eras, but with other cultures. Since reason proves unable to provide an ultimate justification of itself, there is no point pretending that this break does not rest on cultural commitment (and power). — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 407

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s framework: the detachment from tradition that lets Stevens enclose himself inside the Darlington institution mirrors this reflexive break, which Giddens admits rests on cultural commitment rather than self-justifying reason. — connects to: Modernity’s reflexivity makes its own rational grounds ultimately puzzling — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 124; Modernity is defined by wholesale reflexivity, not merely love of the new. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 99; Modernity’s reflexivity subverts reason’s claim to certitude. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 100 (+6 more)

Broader Connections