Modern antiblack bias stems from perceived value violations, not biological inferiority claims

Evidence

Symbolic racism proposes that racial bias is no longer the result of perceptions that Blacks are biologically inferior to Whites (i.e., traditional racism), but instead is due to beliefs that Blacks violate and thereby threaten values that are important to Whites (Sears, … 1988). For example, White Americans may believe that the value of equity prevalent in the White-dominated American culture is threatened by affirmative action programs. Many Whites may not believe that prejudice and discrimination are still prevalent and therefore see such programs as violating the equity value by giving minorities an unfair advantage. This is a different construal of Whites’ reactions to affirmative action than that proposed by RGCT, with the threat arising from conflicting values rather than perceived competition over resources. — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes, 32

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines symbolic racism as distinct from both biological racism and realistic-group-conflict resource competition.
  • ADDENDUM: Presents symbolic-racism value threat as a rival mechanism to realistic threat over resources, parallel to how the sacrifice and trees articles distinguish motive types.
  • XREF: connects to: Modern prejudice fuses moral values with anti-outgroup affect; Aversive racism arises from conflict between disavowed anti-Black feelings and egalitarian beliefs — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2093; Deep-seated fairness values create inner conflict with prejudice (+8 more)

Broader Connections