Modern ‘attention’ is a narrowed, instrumentalized construct far removed from lived human attention.

Evidence

Over the past century or so, a VAST RANGE OF HUMAN FACULTIES AND EXPERIENCES has been effectively collapsed into a single, narrow, cybernetic (i.e., machine-engaged), quantifiable, and ultimately always-already-instrumentalized THING—a thing we CALL “attention,” and worry about as “attention,” but that has as little to do with the true cosmos of human attention as a sex-ed class has to do with human love. Which is to say, not nothing. But not that much, either. — The Friends of Attention, Attensity!, 122

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Core diagnostic distinction between the cybernetic construct called ‘attention’ and the lived reality of human attention.
  • XREF: The sex-ed/love analogy parallels critiques of quantified self-tracking (e.g., Gary Wolf’s Quantified Self criticism by scholars like Natasha Dow Schull).
  • SEED: Angle: how the modern ‘attention’ concept is a category error with a specific genealogy — candidate for an essay tracing the term’s lab origins.