Mixed-race populations’ visibility enabled early modern racism

Evidence

In addition, the growth of creole communities, mainly in the Americas, but also in parts of Asia and Africa, led inevitably to the appearance of Eurasians, Eurafricans, as well as Euramericans, not as occasional curiosities but as visible social groups. Their emergence permitted a style of thinking to flourish which foreshadows modern racism. Portugal, earliest of Europe’s planetary conquerors, provides an apt illustration of this point. In the last decade of the fifteenth century Dom Manuel I could still ‘solve’ his ‘Jewish question’ by mass, forcible conversion – possibly the last European ruler to find this solution both satisfactory and ‘natural’. Less than a century later, however, one finds Alexandre Valignano, the great reorganizer of the Jesuit mission in Asia between 1574 and 1606, vehemently opposing the admission of Indians and Eurindians to the priesthood — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 229

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Anderson locates the historical origin of ‘racial’ thinking in the visibility of mixed-race groups rather than in biological doctrine per se — a pivotal dating/definitional claim for the field’s genealogy of race.
  • XREF: Directly scaffolds the Islamophobia field’s genealogy of race-thinking — this is the pre-history of biological racialism that later Orientalist classification draws on. — connects to: Color stratification encodes fine-grained social status within colonized societies.; Large Black populations in Greco-Roman society did not produce modern color prejudice; Mixed-light complexions gain economic and social status in colonial societies (+2 more)

Broader Connections