Medieval Christian polemicists refused Muslim sources on Muhammad’s life on principle

Evidence

In order to prove that Muhammad is indeed Antichrist, one has to know something of his biography. Alvarus and Eulogius are of course not about to ask the Muslims themselves; who would trust a life of Antichrist written by his acolytes? On the contrary, Eulogius discourages dialogue with Muslims; one must learn about the false prophet from trustworthy Christians: which is to say, for Eulogius, from Christians untainted by contact with Muslims. — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 524

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • QUESTION: Does this ‘only enemies write truthfully about the enemy’s founder’ epistemic rule have parallels in any modern religious or political polemic?