McGurk (incongruent) targets produce consistently longer response times than congruent ones

Evidence

The results are consistent with the previous findings (Nahorna et al. 2012 ) in which response times were larger for McGurk targets, independently on context. In both experiments and in all contexts, the processing of “ba” responses was indeed quicker compared to McGurk responses. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5174 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Coupled congruent syllables are processed about 70 ms faster than McGurk targets.; Fused McGurk percepts take longer to process than matching audiovisual syllables — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5174

Related

• Coupled congruent syllables are processed about 70 ms faster than McGurk targets. (similarity 0.98)
• Fused McGurk percepts take longer to process than matching audiovisual syllables (similarity 0.92)
• McGurk responses are processed 70-80 ms slower than matching audiovisual targets (similarity 0.92)
• Congruent audiovisual speech is processed faster than McGurk fusion responses (similarity 0.91)
• McGurk fusion responses take about 70-80 ms longer than congruent audiovisual responses (similarity 0.87)
• Short preceding incoherent contexts maximally suppress the McGurk effect (similarity 0.79)
• Binding the visual stream to the less-coherent auditory source shrinks later McGurk fusion (similarity 0.78)

Broader Connections

• Fused McGurk percepts take longer to process than matching audiovisual syllables #corroborates (0.95) — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 5174