Masses differ from classes by lacking common-interest articulation

Evidence

One must therefore distinguish between historically organic ideologies, those, that is, which are necessary to a given structure, and ideologies that are arbitrary, rationalistic, or “willed”. To the extent that ideologies are historically necessary they have a validity which is “psychological”; they “organise” human masses, and create the terrain on which men move, acquire consciousness of their position, struggle, etc. To the extent that they are arbitrary they only create individual “movements”, polemics and so on (though even these are not completely useless, since they function like an error which by contrasting with truth, demonstrates it). — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1342 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Masses are people unintegratable into common-interest organizations — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 746; Smallholders form a class through mere numerical aggregation, not collective organization; Impartiality’s false symmetry neutralizes opposition and suppresses class content (+5 more)

Broader Connections