Marginalized people reclaim themselves in language by turning the oppressor’s tongue against itself

Evidence

To recognize that we touch one an other in language seems particularly difficult in a society that would have us believe that there is no dignity in the experience of passion, that to feel deeply is to be inferior, for within the dualism of Western metaphysical thought, ideas are always more important than language. To heal the splitting of mind and body, we marginalized and oppressed people attempt to recover ourselves and our experiences in language. We seek to make a place for intimacy. Unable to find such a place in standard English, we create the ruptured, broken, unruly speech of the vernacular. When I need to say words that do more than simply mirror or address the dominant reality, I speak black vernacular. There, in that location, we make English do what we want it to do. We take the oppressor’s language and turn it against itself. We make our words a counter-hegemonic speech, liberating our selves in language. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 349

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the core concern in hooks’ teaching practice of creating a place for intimacy via vernacular — ties to chapter 5’s community framing. — connects to: Enslaved Africans’ linguistic loss was itself a source of terror; Deliberate grammatical rupture in slave spirituals encoded rebellion — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 342; Creating space for marginalized vernacular speech can itself begin healing (+8 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections