Lutfï al-Sayyid equated Egyptian and Sudanese subjection to shared autocratic rule

Evidence

A further irony in the situation was the way Fawzï justified his right to high rank through his actions as a colonizing officer of the Egyptian army. If anything clearly emerges from these parallels it is that the idea of colonialism was much more fluid, much less dependent on the European model. After all, Egyptians in 1882 were negotiators familiar with the Ottoman Empire and fearful of the threat of European colonization, and yet also eager to see themselves as a nation in a synonymous position of power. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 527 (#expands, via linked claim)

The Sudan was a testing ground for Egyptian virility, for the individuals who had shed their blood there (fighting the Sudanese), and for the entire national project of independence at a time when the dominant worldview insisted that independent, self-reliant nations were by definition also regional, if not global, conquerors. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 726 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Egyptians produced their own Orientalist discourse about the Sudan and Africa; Egyptian nationalism combined anti-imperialism with its own imperial claims over Sudan; Egypt functioned simultaneously as colonized and colonizer of Sudan — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 527 (+1 more)

Broader Connections