Lull saw Muslim and Christian fears of misbelief as mirror images

Evidence

These episodes may be exaggerated; but Fidenzio himself followed the victorious army of the sultan as it retired to Damascus, in the hope of helping the Christian prisoners, and some of the Muslims, with the events of the capture of the Christian city fresh in their minds, asked him why Christians adored pictures and images. It was not, Fidenzio of course replied, the images, but the saints in heaven whom they represented, that Christians venerated. “They were silent, not knowing what else to say.’ — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 640 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Llull rejects the Dominican strategy, forging his own approach, an idiosyncratic fusion of Dominican rationalism and thoroughness with Franciscan mysticism and pathos. For Llull, the superiority of Christianity to Islam can be demonstrated rationally, if through the rather abstruse and idiosyncratic tool of Llull’s Art. For Llull (as for many earlier authors) Muhammad lacks the signs of prophecy, and the Koran is full of contradictions. He asserts that learned Muslims themselves are aware of this and do not believe that Muhammad was a prophet. They are (like Peter the Venerable’s imagined Muslim audience a century and a half earlier) an audience ripe for conversion, if only Christians can properly attend to the task. — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 1279 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Demonizing Islam grew from anxiety over its uncomfortable similarity to Christianity; Christian polemicists imagined educated Muslims as secretly doubting their own faith — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 1279; Christian views of Islam reflected their own preconceptions more than actual Muslims (+5 more)

Broader Connections