Local identity categories often explain linguistic practice better than analysts’ broad sociological categories.

Evidence

Within sociocultural linguistics, the concern with identities as broader social structures is particularly characteristic of early variationist sociolinguistics (e.g. Labov, 1966) and the sociology of language (see Fishman, 1971, among others). The traditional forms of these approaches have been valuable for documenting largescale sociolinguistic trends; they are often less effective in capturing the more nuanced and flexible kinds of identity relations that arise in local contexts (but see, e.g. Labov, 1963). This analytic gap points to the importance of ethnography. Linguistic ethnographers have repeatedly demonstrated that language users often orient to local identity categories rather than to the analyst’s sociological categories and that the former frequently provide a better empirical account of linguistic practice. — Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction, 35

Categorization

  • XREF: The ‘orient to local rather than analyst’s categories’ move echoes ethnomethodology/Garfinkel’s critique of analysts imposing categories, and fits ‘routing and reinvention in real conversational data’. — connects to: Macro social categories poorly capture the identity relations that matter locally — Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction: A…, 35; Cultures differ in whether identity derives from relationships rather than from category membership — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 1626; Group identification varies qualitatively across cultures, not just in degree — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 1604 (+5 more)

Broader Connections