Legal European status contradicted the label of imitation Europeans

Evidence

The notion that the Dutch administration could, if it so desired, craft “imitation Europeans” (nagemaakte Europeanen)-or that this was what the Inlandsche kinderen sought to become-begged certain questions. If many were legally classiïŹed as European, then how could they be “imitations,” “defective” versions of what they already were? Alternately, how could they be made into “perfected natives” if a founding colonial 11 When this 1874 statement reappeared in the 1901 report of the European Pauperism Commission, the crucial modifying adjective did not remain the same: “naggemaakte” (imitation) European was replaced by “gemankeerde” (defective) European, underscoring how premise construed them as a group who should never ally with, feel afïŹliation with, or take their cultural cues from the native population. — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic
, 654

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces the term nagemaakte Europeanen and the paradox it encodes for legal-status versus produced-identity.
  • QUESTION: The excerpt trails into an unfinished question contrast (‘perfected natives’); worth noting the full antinomy the chapter develops.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic
, 654
  • XREF: connects to: European participation in the rebellion collapsed the colonial legal distinction — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 207; Colonial officials proposed legal recognition of European status based on visible racial traits; The Ethical Policy’s rhetoric of native welfare excluded mixed-race Europeans from its scope (+3 more)

Broader Connections