Language’s irreducible privacy, rooted in mortality, fuels colonial rage at the colonized

Evidence

If every language is acquirable, its acquisition requires a real portion of a person’s life: each new conquest is measured against shortening days. What limits one’s access to other languages is not their imperviousness but one’s own mortality. Hence a certain privacy to all languages. French and American imperialists governed, exploited, and killed Vietnamese over many years. But whatever else they made off with, the Vietnamese language stayed put. Accordingly, only too often, a rage at Vietnamese ā€˜inscrutability,’ and that obscure despair which engenders the venomous argots of dying colonialisms: ā€˜gooks,’ ā€˜ratons’, etc. (In the longer run, the only responses to the vast privacy of the language of the oppressed are retreat or further massacre.) — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 567

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the Scaffolding Theory toolkit: this is the linguistic face of the colonized ā€˜Other’ being unassimilable, feeding into the Islamophobia readings on untranslatable difference. — connects to: Formerly colonized peoples risk adopting the dominating discourse against themselves; Colonial hysteria manifested in murderous acts for settlers but suicide-like self-exposure for the colonized; The colonized also wield knowledge-as-power discourses against those they colonize (+8 more)

Broader Connections