Kettonâs medieval Qurâan mistranslated but did not deliberately distort Islam
Evidence
The implications of the text as this puts it are obvious. A careful comparison with the Qurâanic original will show how, with a minimum of inaccuracy, it gives an erroneous sense. Thus the Prophetâs being allowed more wives than the other believers becomes promiscuous access to all women; a suggestive phrase about their offering their bodies derives really from permission for marriage without a dowry. The final verse refers to the obligation of the Prophet to sleep with his wives in rotation; instead of conferring promiscuous licence, it regulates marital rights. It was to this Revelation that âAâishah referred when she said that God hastened to satisfy Muhammadâs desires; but the reprobatio understood something much more shameful. â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 565 (
#contradicts, via linked claim)
The infinite respect for authority did not extend to the letter of the text. Provided that the words of the Qurâan cited proved the untruth of Islam, they were correctly cited. Verbal accuracy was not sought at all. The Qurâan would be quoted as rendering correctly some tenet of Islam (whether true or supposed ) to which it was desired, for polemic reasons, to draw attention; for example, âthey were ordered to rob, to make prisoner and killâ or âwhatever (those in Paradise ) desired would immediately be suppliedâ. â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1410 (
#contradicts, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Medieval Christians read the Qurâan as inadvertent testimony to Christian truth â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1079; Medieval European conflation of Qurâan and Traditions may have been a deliberate polemic tactic; Medieval polemicists quoted the Qurâan inaccurately without scruple â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1410 (+3 more)
Related
- Medieval Christian polemic distorted Qurâanic texts with minimal inaccuracy (similarity 0.91)
- Medieval European conflation of Qurâan and Traditions may have been a deliberate polemic tactic (similarity 0.90)
- Medieval attacks on the Qurâan obscured its evident piety to unlearned readers (similarity 0.89)
- Christian polemicists distorted Qurâanic verses with small, impactful translation shifts (similarity 0.88)
- Medieval Christian polemic interpreted Qurâanic texts as nastily as possible (similarity 0.87)
- Ketton deliberately obscured Islamâs claim to universal prophethood (similarity 0.86)
- Medieval polemicists quoted the Qurâan inaccurately without scruple (similarity 0.84)
- Christian polemicists distorted the Qurâan by insisting it lacked charges they knew were there. (similarity 0.84)
- Medieval Christians read the Qurâan as inadvertent testimony to Christian truth (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval polemicists distorted Quranic verses to serve anti-Muslim arguments (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval anti-Muslim translators deliberately mistranslated texts to make Islam repulsive. (similarity 0.83)
- Medieval Christians polemicists routinely conflated the Qurâan with reported sayings of Muhammad (similarity 0.83)
- Ricoldo first conflated hadith commentary with the Qurâanic text (similarity 0.82)
- Mediaeval Christian polemicists dismissed Quranic metaphors by misreading them as literal physics (similarity 0.81)
- Medieval polemicists attacked the Qurâan with pedantic misreadings to prove Muhammad misunderstood truths (similarity 0.81)
Broader Connections
- Medieval Christian polemic distorted Qurâanic texts with minimal inaccuracy
#contradicts(0.92) â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 565 - Medieval polemicists quoted the Qurâan inaccurately without scruple
#contradicts(0.90) â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1410 - Medieval European conflation of Qurâan and Traditions may have been a deliberate polemic tactic
#qualifies(0.88) - Medieval Christians read the Qurâan as inadvertent testimony to Christian truth
#expands(0.85) â Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1079 - Medieval attacks on the Qurâan obscured its evident piety to unlearned readers
#expands(0.82)