Ketton’s medieval Qur’an mistranslated but did not deliberately distort Islam

Evidence

The implications of the text as this puts it are obvious. A careful comparison with the Qur’anic original will show how, with a minimum of inaccuracy, it gives an erroneous sense. Thus the Prophet’s being allowed more wives than the other believers becomes promiscuous access to all women; a suggestive phrase about their offering their bodies derives really from permission for marriage without a dowry. The final verse refers to the obligation of the Prophet to sleep with his wives in rotation; instead of conferring promiscuous licence, it regulates marital rights. It was to this Revelation that ‘A’ishah referred when she said that God hastened to satisfy Muhammad’s desires; but the reprobatio understood something much more shameful. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 565 (#contradicts, via linked claim)

The infinite respect for authority did not extend to the letter of the text. Provided that the words of the Qur’an cited proved the untruth of Islam, they were correctly cited. Verbal accuracy was not sought at all. The Qur’an would be quoted as rendering correctly some tenet of Islam (whether true or supposed ) to which it was desired, for polemic reasons, to draw attention; for example, ‘they were ordered to rob, to make prisoner and kill’ or ‘whatever (those in Paradise ) desired would immediately be supplied’. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1410 (#contradicts, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Medieval Christians read the Qur’an as inadvertent testimony to Christian truth — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1079; Medieval European conflation of Qur’an and Traditions may have been a deliberate polemic tactic; Medieval polemicists quoted the Qur’an inaccurately without scruple — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1410 (+3 more)

Broader Connections