Japan accepted US rule of Okinawa to avoid bases on the mainland.

Evidence

Thus, when the occupation of Japan ended in 1952, the United States continued to rule Okinawa and smaller islands like Iwo Jima. American officials described Japan as maintaining “residual sovereignty” over these islands, but the U.S. government retained the right to establish military facilities on them, and effectively to govern them as it wished. This arrangement was politically palatable to Japanese leaders because concentrating U.S. bases and troops in a colonized part of Japan meant reducing the U.S. military’s impact elsewhere. — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases
, 843

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • DEFINE: Explains ‘residual sovereignty’ as a legal fiction masking continued US colonial control.
  • XREF: Connects to postcolonial studies of how metropolitan states offload militarization costs onto peripheries.

Broader Connections

  • Okinawa bases lock Japan into a subordinate client-state role under U.S. control #corroborates (0.60) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases
, 887
  • Japan secretly paid over a billion dollars to get Okinawa ‘returned’ to it #expands (0.55) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases
, 877
  • Closing Futenma was conditioned on building Marines a new Okinawa base. #exemplifies (0.50) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases
, 853