Closing Futenma was conditioned on building Marines a new Okinawa base.
Evidence
But when the U.S. and Japanese governments signed their 1996 agreement, there was a catch: the military wouldn’t close Futenma until the Japanese government built the Marines a new base. And although most Okinawans expected the replacement would be outside their prefecture, the two governments selected a site on Okinawa’s east coast, near an existing base called Camp Schwab. — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases…, 853
Categorization
Category: Causal Relationships
Related
- The promised Futenma closure was conditioned on building another Okinawa base (similarity 0.96)
- Only some Okinawans oppose bases despite wanting Futenma closed. (similarity 0.84)
- Stakeholder benefits from the status quo stall base closures. (similarity 0.82)
- Japan accepted US rule of Okinawa to avoid bases on the mainland. (similarity 0.82)
- The Futenma response agreement produced billions in new US housing funded by Japan. (similarity 0.81)
- Economic dependency forces Okinawa to accept the bases. (similarity 0.81)
- Okinawa bases protect the Marine Corps from existential budget scrutiny (similarity 0.81)
- Okinawan base-realignment promises have largely gone unfulfilled for two decades (similarity 0.79)
- The US announced Okinawa troop reductions while simultaneously increasing local forces (similarity 0.79)
- Okinawa’s Marine force shrank sharply during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars without harm (similarity 0.79)
- Local protest can stop new base construction even when it cannot close existing bases (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- The Futenma replacement base proposal drew cost, safety, and environmental objections.
#expands(0.55) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases…, 854 - Marine Corps bureaucratic survival fears drive its resistance to leaving Okinawa
#complicates(0.50) — David Vine, Base Nation_ How U.S. Military Bases…, 886