Iranian experience reveals what official whiteness can and cannot protect.

Evidence

By probing a different ordinary social setting in each chapter, in this book I make the case that Iranian Americans (1) sit, categorically, at the outer limits of whiteness and, more important, (2) possess social experiences that reflect the outer boundaries and limitations of what “official” whiteness can achieve or mobilize. That is, an examination of where Iranians fit into an American racial hierarchy opens new sight lines into what protection, shelter, or cover “legal” whiteness does or does not offer immigrants and their children in the twenty-first century. By recognizing Iranian Americans at the limits of whiteness, we are better able to name and identify what the limits of whiteness actually are. — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness, 66

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the book’s core concept: Iranians as a diagnostic case for locating the actual limits of legal whiteness.
  • XREF: This ‘limits of whiteness’ framing parallels the reader’s race-struggle counter-history motif in Foucault and the question of citizenship-based essentialist identity. — connects to: Iran has functioned as a racial fencepost determining whiteness’s boundaries — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 34; Iranians functioned as a racial hinge anchoring others’ claims to whiteness — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 117; Iranians were legally white but socially browned after the hostage crisis — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 118 (+9 more)

Broader Connections