Intentionality is irrelevant to the constraining force of past decisions.

Evidence

But if the salient feature of entrenchment is control of the future by the past, it is not obvious why the purposes or motivations of political decision makers should matter at all. From the perspective of the present, the constraints imposed by past decisions will be the same regardless of whether they were intended or entirely inadvertent. — Daryl Levinson and Benjamin I. Sachs, Political Entrenchment and Public Law, 491

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly bears on the reader’s purpose: whether rationalizing ideology must be intentionally embedded to be sticky, or whether unintentional lock-in suffices. — connects to: Persuasion by past reasoning is not the same as obeying precedent. — Frederick Schauer, Thinking Like a Lawyer, 66; Good intentions do not guarantee good philosophical outcomes; Rational choice theory treats sunk costs as irrelevant to future decisions — Jörg Sydow, Georg Schreyögg, and Jochen Koch, Organizational Path Dependence: Opening…, 61 (+5 more)

Broader Connections