Integrating multiple threat types yields stronger models than testing each type separately.

Evidence

Integrative frameworks, such as W. G. Stephan and Stephan’s (2000) ITT seem to be advantageous relative to examining each threat type separately because interrelationships between the threat types can be examined. This suggests that future research should consider integrating as many threats as possible. — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes, 125

Categorization

• XREF: Supports the MOC’s move to package threat types together rather than separately - the meta-analysis empirically vindicates an integrative architecture. — connects to: Broad multi-facet threat scales capture stronger threat-attitude correlations than single-facet ones — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup…, 134

Broader Connections

• Broad multi-facet threat scales capture stronger threat-attitude correlations than single-facet ones #corroborates (0.85) — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes, 134