In nearly all weaponed species, males carry the weapons, not females.

Evidence

In every way that matters for this book, jacanas are backward. Females are more aggressive than males, they are larger than males, they fight more viciously and frequently than males, and they have larger weapons. Usually it’s the other way around. In flies, beetles, mastodons, crabs, and elk, males are armed, not females. Jacanas excepted, in every species with weapons confined to a single sex, males have those weapons. Why should just one sex have weapons? And why is it (almost) always the males? β€” Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 149

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to sexual selection theory (Darwin, bateman gradients) that this book’s later chapters on weapon evolution will build on. β€” connects to: Big weapons only benefit males with the reserves to wield them effectively β€” Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 355; Weapon size is favored when males defend resources females need β€” Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 960; Males evolve big weapons to defend resources that females visit

Broader Connections