Imperial feminism justifies conquest without improving colonized women’s conditions

Evidence

The oppression of women became another tool to demarcate the supposed inferiority not only of the colonized male but of the colonized society as a whole. Gendered Orientalism or imperial feminism emerged as a coherent ideology in this context. To be sure, despite claims to emancipate women, the conditions for Egyptian women under British colonial rule did not improve, and in certain areas such as education they saw a further curtailment, as Ahmed notes. This state of affairs continues in the twenty-first century when imperial feminism was deployed to justify the US/NATO invasion and occupation of Afghanistan in 2001, as described in Chapter 3. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 159

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to reader’s ‘Complaints About Immodesty’ published piece, where moral panics over women’s dress similarly serve class and imperial signaling ends. — connects to: Suffragists argued women’s rights would strengthen Britain’s empire — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of
, 149; Imperial feminism weaponizes women’s rights rhetoric to justify colonial rule without improving women’s conditions — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of
, 157; Colonial powers co-opted feminism to justify empire while opposing it at home (+8 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Cromer’s imperial feminism mirrors the Lex Oppia/sumptuary dynamic of my essay where dress-policing rhetoric tracks political projects, not women’s actual welfare.

Broader Connections