Huntington’s clash thesis erases power asymmetries among Muslims and fuels racism.

Evidence

Huntington’s essentialist and reductive approach makes no distinction between violence that is engaged on equal footing, violence that is perpetrated by dominant Muslim powers, and violence that is done to subordinated Muslims, including to Muslim women and children: … Islam has bloody borders. This argument that replaces communism with Islam as the global bogeyman has enormous attraction for those already predisposed to Islamophobia. Reflecting this essentialist perspective, in the pursuit of empire, recent American invasions often include the view that Muslims in invaded lands are racially different than those who invade. The racist stereotypes used to describe the “natives” in the Muslim world are the same ones used in the United States to alienate immigrant Muslims, to render them separate and unassimilable even though they are already a highly assimilated immigrant population. — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 241

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to comparing her racecraft lens with Aziz’s treatment of clash-of-civilizations discourse. — connects to: Media and scholarship doubly erase black American Muslims’ existence and voices. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 452; Huntington’s clash thesis named all of Islam, not just fundamentalism, as the West’s problem — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 229; Muslims were doubly erased as either distant inferiors or militant Black Americans — Sahar F. Aziz, The Racial Muslim: When Racism Quashes…, 522 (+7 more)
  • QUESTION: The claim that the same stereotypes operate abroad and domestically deserves probing — is the mechanism shared or merely parallel?

Broader Connections