Human rights advocates legitimized progressive-sounding counterinsurgency warfare

Evidence

Middle East studies scholar Laleh Khalili observes that the involvement of liberal human rights practitioners in the drafting of the Counterinsurgency Field Manual meant that population-centric counterinsurgency [where the military would no longer be simply a tool of force but also one of modernization] is now considered a progressive form of warfare by many liberal interventionists in European and North American capitals. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 493

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly contradicts the ‘humanitarian’ self-image of liberal interventionism and connects to the cluster’s claim that Islamophobia discourse launders imperial violence. — connects to: Human-rights discourse has replaced civilizational rhetoric as war’s legitimation; Neoliberal human rights legitimize state violence to protect global markets.; Human-rights rhetoric functions as core neoconservative propaganda, not liberal exclusivity (+9 more)

Broader Connections