Hindutva defines Indian citizenship by religion-of-origin within sacred territory

Evidence

Savarkar made Hindu and Indian synonymous, each forming a monolithic unit. He described the land of India as marked by rivers and mountains that have been mentioned in ancient Hindu holy texts. Dotted with Hindu pilgrimages, it is territory made sacred through its association with Hindu cosmogony and mythology. India, he said, therefore belongs to those Indians whose religions originated within this land: thus tying up territory and belief with a double knot. The rest – Indian Christians and Muslims – are not truly Indians, however long their ancestors may have lived in this land. Their religion dooms them to be stranded in their own country as perpetual foreigners. — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized, 1158

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallels the chapter’s core ‘sacralized religion marks internal threats’ grammar from the MOC thread; Savarkar’s punyabhu definition mirrors how sacred territorial claims racialize religious minorities as permanent foreigners — compare with Zionist founding claims in earlier chapters of this book. — connects to: India’s citizenship laws make Indian nationality synonymous with Hindu identity; The Citizenship Amendment Act ties Indian citizenship to Hindu identity — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 418; Hindutva reframed Hinduism as a political identity mandating Muslim exclusion from India (+9 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines Hindutva’s core citizenship criterion: religion originating within sacred land distinguishes genuine nationals from perpetual foreigners.

Broader Connections