High-capacity authoritarian regimes confine claim-making to state limits or surveilled niches

Evidence

The upper-left corner (high capacity, low democracy) includes regimes in which any public, collective claim-making occurs either within stringent limits imposed by the government or in niches that have somehow escaped governmental surveillance and control. The dispatches from Morocco make clear that the government leaves little room for public dissent. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 427

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 427
• XREF: connects to: Low-capacity nondemocratic regimes tolerate wide contentious claim-making. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 448; Regimes shape claim-making repertoires through control, constitution of claimants, and issue streams — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1168; High-capacity authoritarian regimes can nonetheless be overturned by sustained contention. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1335 (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• Higher regime capacity with some democratic freedoms produces intermediate contention #qualifies (0.78) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 503
• Authoritarian measures can persist within nominally democratic structures via normalized crisis #expands (0.72) — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism, 7