Hegelian negativity is a preserving virtual mode distinct from the merely non-existent

Evidence

This negativity manifests itself as virtuality. 2Εις, in so far as it is something possessed and held in reserve, falls outside the scope of that category called by Hegel ‘abstract negativity’; it is rather instead a negation which preserves that which it negates (/λλ ωσις without corruption). From this it follows that negation is in fact a modality of what the Greeks knew as the µ4 6ν – that which might not be – the non-existent as a problematic way of being: distinguishing it from the κ 6ν – that which is not – signifying the absolute lack of being. The negative adverb µ indicates a case where negation is accompanied by a doubt, as opposed to the adverb κ which denies a certain fact. Hegelian negativity, the nature of a being which is suppressed ‘but has not definitively disappeared’, of a ‘state midway between being and nothing’, requires this modality of the µ4 6ν which is one of the central meanings of virtuality. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 480

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precision at its best: distinguishes me-on (virtual could-not-be) from ouk-on (absolute non-being), showing Aufhebung’s preservation as virtualiter.
  • XREF: The preserved-but-transformed virtuality maps strikingly onto how the brain retains supplanted functions/schemas — neural plasticity as Aufhebung. — connects to: Hegelian negativity belongs to the Greek modality of the non-existent-that-might-be; Human activities structurally embed negativity without any explicit negative judgment; Hegelian reflection distributes across multiple perspectives without any single center — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1128 (+2 more)

Broader Connections